|
CITIZENS FOR GLOBAL SOLUTIONS | PRESS RELEASE |
|
| May 20, 2004
U.S. Seeks Renewal of Exemption for
Peacekeepers
Introduces Security Council Resolution Granting Immunity
from ICC
Washington DC -- Late yesterday afternoon, the
United States requested another UN Security Council resolution granting many
United Nations peacekeepers immunity from the International Criminal Court.
The resolution renews the exemption granted in the previous two years under
Resolutions 1422 and 1487, first achieved in a showdown in which the U.S.
vetoed the Bosnia peacekeeping mission and threatened to veto all UN
peacekeeping missions until its demands were met. The Security Council will
consider the resolution on Friday afternoon, during an open debate at which
many countries are expected to raise serious concerns about it.
“Clearly the actions of the International Criminal Court so far should have
put to bed the unreasonable concerns of this administration,” said Heather
Hamilton, Vice President for Programs. “The Court’s actions to date
underscore that it is functioning as intended – looking at only those
situations that truly shock the conscience of humanity and which existing
national and international mechanisms have so far been unable to tackle.”
The International Criminal Court is the only permanent international court
that can try individuals accused of genocide, war crimes and crimes against
humanity when national courts cannot or will not. ICC Prosecutor Luis Moreno
Ocampo has thus far received two referrals from ICC member countries, the
Democratic Republic of Congo and Uganda. The prosecutor has focused his
attention on these two cases while publicly rejecting other requests that
the Court take action.
The resolution prohibits the International Criminal Court (ICC) from
investigating or prosecuting any current or former official or personnel
from a non-ICC country (like the U.S.) participating in a mission authorized
or established by the UN. In an open meeting of the Security Council on 10
July 2002, more than one hundred UN member states made statements opposing
the adoption of Resolution 1422 and declaring that it was contrary to
international law. Last year, in a similar open meeting, UN member states
were virtually unanimous in opposing the renewal of Resolution 1422.
Maggie Gardner, International Law and Justice Program Manager, said “The
last thing the U.S. needs right now is to further antagonize its friends and
give the impression that it sees itself as above the law. This resolution
has little real impact other than to make Americans look like bullies.”
### Notes to Editors:
For more information about the issue, including the text of previous
resolutions, country statements and analysis:
International
Criminal Court Project
International NGO Coalition for the ICC
|
|
OUR NEWSLETTER
|