| |
Rome Statute |
U.S. Constitution |
| Presumption of Innocence |
"Everyone shall be presumed to be innocent until proven guilty before the Court . .
."
(Art. 66) |
"The principle that there is a presumption of innocence in favor of the accused is the undoubted law, axiomatic and elementary, and its enforcement lies at the foundation of the administration of our criminal
law."
Coffin v. United States, 156 U.S. 432, 453 (1895) |
| Speedy & Public Trial |
" . . .the accused shall be entitled to a public hearing . .
."
"the accused shall be entitled . . . to be tried without undue delay; . .
."
(Arts. 67(1), 67(1)(c)) |
"In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, . .
."
(Amendment VI) |
| Assistance of Counsel |
"…the accused shall be entitled…to communicate freely with counsel of accused's
choosing…"
"…the accused shall be entitled… to have legal assistance assigned by the Court where the interests of justice so require, and without payment if he accused lacks sufficient means to pay for
it;…"
(Arts. 67(1)(b), (d)) |
"In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right…to have the Assistance of Counsel for his
defense."
(Amendment VI) |
| Right to Remain Silent |
…the accused shall be entitled…not to be compelled to testify or to confess guilt and to remain silent, without such silence being a consideration in the determination of guilt or
innocence;…"
(Art. 67(1)(g)) |
"No person…shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against
himself…"
(Amendment V) |
| Privilege Against Self-Incrimination |
"…the accused shall be entitled…not to be compelled to testify or to confess
guilt…"
(Arts. 54(1)(a), 67(1)(g)) |
"No person…shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against
himself…"
(Amendment V) |
| Right to Written Statement of Charges |
"…the person shall be provided with a copy of
the…charges…"
(Art. 61(3)) |
"In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right…to be informed of the nature and cause of the
accusation;…"
(Amendment VI) |
| Right to Examine or Have Examined Adverse Witnesses |
"…the accused shall be entitled…to examine, or to have examined…the witnesses against him or
her…"
(Art. 67(1)(e)) |
"In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right…to be confronted with the witnesses against
him;…"
(Amendment VI) |
| Right to Compulsory Process to Obtain Witnesses |
"…the accused shall be entitled…to obtain the attendance and examination of witnesses on his or her
behalf…"
(Art. 67(1)(e)) |
"In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right…to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his
favor,…"
(Amendment VI) |
| Prohibition against Ex Post Facto Crimes |
"A person shall not be criminally responsible…unless the conduct in question constitutes, at the time it takes place, a crime within the jurisdiction of the
Court."
(Art. 22) |
"No Bill of Attainder or ex post facto law shall be
passed."
(Art. I, sec. 9, cl. 3) |
| Protection against Double Jeopardy |
"No person who has been tried by another court…shall be tried by the Court with respect to the same
conduct…"
(Art. 20) |
"…nor shall any person be subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or
limb;…"
(Amendment V) |
| Freedom from Warrantless Arrest & Searches |
"…the Pre-Trial Chamber may…issue…warrants as may be required…""…if it [the Pre-Trial Chamber] is satisfied that there are reasonable grounds to believe that the person has committed a crime…and the arrest of the person appears
necessary…"
(Arts. 57 bis (3),(58)) |
"[N]o Warrants shall issue, but upon probable
cause…"
(Amendment IV) |
| Right to be Present at Trial |
"The accused shall be present during the
trial."
(Art. 63) |
"one of the most basic of the rights guaranteed by the Confrontation Clause is the accused's
right to be present in the courtroom at every stage of his
trial."
Illinois v. Allen, 397 U.S. 337,338 (1970)
(Citing Lewis v. United States, 146 U.S. 370 (1892)) |
| Exclusion of Illegally Obtained Evidence |
"Evidence obtained by means of a violation of this Statute or internationally recognized human rights shall not be
admissible…"
(Art. 69(7)) |
When evidence is obtained in violation of the Fourth Amendment, the judicially developed exclusionary rule usually precludes its use in a criminal proceeding against the victim of the illegal search and
seizure.
Illinois v. Krull, 480 U.S. 340, 347 (1987)
(Citing Weeks v. United States, 232 U.S. 383 (1914); Mapp v.
Ohio, 367 U.S. 643 (1961)) |
| Prohibition against Trials in absentia |
"The accused shall be present during the
trial."
(Art. 63) |
When defendant knowingly absents himself from court during trial, court may "proceed with trial in like manner and with like effect as if he were
present."
Diaz v. United States, 223 U.S. 442, 455 (1912)
The language, history, and logic of Rule 43 support a straightforward interpretation that prohibits the trial
in absentia of a defendant who is not present at the beginning of
trial.
Crosby v. United States, 506 U.S. 255, 262 (1993) |
