|
Latin American Nations
Targeted in the FY 2006 Foreign Ops
Under the FY 2006 Foreign aid spending bill, Mexico, Brazil, Peru, Ecuador,
Paraguay and Venezuela stand to lose $30.3 million in U.S. ESF money
combined.
MEXICO: the U.S.’s second largest trading partner
Mexico recently became the 100th country to ratify the
Rome Statute for the ICC, and, because of this ratification, it stands to
lose $11.5 million in FY 2006 ESF aid. This aid, according to the U.S. State
Department, will specifically be used to “promote democracy and improved
economic competitiveness by strengthening the rule of law and supporting
greater transparency and accountability in government.
Funds will be used for technical assistance and training
to support civil and criminal justice reform, greater respect for human
rights, and greater access to justice for disadvantaged populations in
selected states.”
-
The State Department describes Mexico as lending
“unprecedented cooperation in such areas as immigration, law enforcement
and counter narcotics, hemispheric affairs, and trade and investment
expansion."
Mexico is the United States’ second largest trading
partner.
BRAZIL: the “largest economy is South America”
In FY 2006, Brazil stands to lose $750,000 in ESF aid.
Brazil has the largest economy in South America and is home to significant
U.S. investment. The U.S. and Brazil frequently cooperate effectively on
numerous issues, including promoting democratic values and stability in the
region, as well as combating international crime.
-
According to the U.S. State Department, “U.S.
national interests in Brazil include the promotion of sustainable
economic growth and regional stability, expansion of free trade, control
of international crime, terrorism and drug trafficking, poverty
alleviation, environmental protection, and reduction of infectious
disease.”
PERU: critical human rights funding at stake
Peru stands to lose $8 million in FY 2006 ESF aid. These
funds are critical for the country’s efforts to decrease coca production, as
well as promote democracy by enhancing local governance. Most importantly, a
part of the ESF slated for Peru is to assist the country’s Truth and
Reconciliation Commission for human rights abuses committed under its former
regime.
-
The State Department states that the U.S.’s
“ability to see eye to eye on such issues as counterterrorism, economic
reform, democratic integration and counter narcotics has led to one of
the highest points” in the Peru-U.S. relationship.
ECUADOR: “a staunch counter-drug ally”
Ecuador stands to lose $7 million in FY 2006 ESF aid.
This is a country with a per capita annual income of $1,600. Ecuador needs
this assistance to combat drug trafficking, strengthen its democratic
institutions, fight corruption and foster economic development.
PARAGUAY: a partner in the fight against terrorism
Aside from consolidating democracy and fortifying the
open market system, Paraguay is an important U.S. partner in the fight
against terrorism. Paraguay, however, stands to lose $2.55 million in FY
2006 ESF aid.
-
This aid, according to the U.S. State Department is
intended to “strengthen the capacity of private and public sectors,
fight corruption, and demand reforms. ESF will promote democracy by
strengthening civil society, encouraging anti-corruption reforms, and
supporting democratic political parties.”
VENEZUELA: “a leading supplier of foreign oil”
Venezuela stands to lose $500,000 in FY 2006 ESF aid.
Venezuela would use these funds to strengthen democratic institutions,
promote the rule of law and respect for human rights, and ensure free, fair
and transparent presidential elections in 2006.
November 15, 2005
+ TAKE ACTION
|
background information
ECONOMIC SUPPORT FUNDS
promote America’s foreign policy
interests by providing assistance to key U.S. allies and countries in
democratic transition. The fund assists Middle East peace negotiations
and finances economic stabilization programs, often in a multi-donor
context.
+ ECONOMIC SUPPORT FUND
BILATERAL IMMUNITY AGREEMENTS
otherwise referred to as Article 98 agreements, prohibit states
that are party to the International Criminal Court (ICC) from sending
any U.S. personnel to the Court. Since the summer of 2002, the Bush
Administration has sought to conclude bilateral immunity agreements with
every country in the world.
+
SUMMARY OF BILATERAL
IMMUNITY AGREEMENTS
+ TEXT OF A BIA (PDF)
the INTERNATIONAL criminal COURT is the only permanent international court capable of trying individuals
accused of genocide, war crimes and crimes against humanity when there is no
other recourse for justice.
+ BACKGROUND
INFORMATION ON THE ICC
+ CURRENT ICC
CASES
+
MORE ICC RESOURCES
|