|
SUDAN AGREES "IN PRINCIPLE" TO A HYBRID
U.N.-AU FORCE FOR DARFUR AT MEETING WITH U.N. AND AU OFFICIALS
At a meeting convened by outgoing U.N.
Secretary General Kofi Annan and co-chaired by the Chairperson of the African
Union Commission, the Sudanese government agreed "in principle" to a mixed United
Nations-African Union force for the Darfur region of Sudan. Although the final
details of the hybrid peacekeeping force are yet to be determined, Sudan's consent "in
principle" is a significant step forward for the troubled region.
The African Union (AU) met this week in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia with Sudanese
officials to discuss the situation in Darfur and its force in the region, the
African Union Mission in Sudan (AMIS). The United Nations Security Council had
originally planned on attending the AU meeting, but canceled its plans
due to a lack of consensus on a Security Council message regarding the scope and
mandate of AMIS.
U.N. Secretary General Kofi Annan held a meeting on Thursday, November 16, in Addis
Ababa with key leaders to try and break the deadlock on Darfur. Among
those present were officials from the five permanent members of the Security
Council and several African countries, including Sudan. In addition to
discussing a hybrid U.N.-AU force for Darfur, Secretary General Annan also
called for possible troops in Chad along the Chadian-Sudanese border. In recent
weeks, janjaweed attacks in Chad have caused tens of thousands of Chadians
to flee their homes. Many humanitarian groups and internally-displaced persons (IDPs)
in Chad expect attacks on camps soon.
Annan proposed three steps for a U.N. Darfur plan, which includes a "Light Support
Package" of $21 million for the current African Union force on the ground. The
U.N. would then deploy several hundred soldiers and police to Darfur in a "Heavy
Support Package" before expanding to a hybrid U.N.-AU force with U.N. command
and control. The eventual hybrid force -- which could total 20,000 troops if
agreed upon by the Sudanese government -- could end up costing the U.N. $77 million in
military, police, and civilian personnel.
The hybrid force would maintain a largely African character but would see
increases in funding and equipment due to the AU-U.N. partnership and
accessibility to U.N. resources. An African character would ensure that troops
come as much as possible from African countries, with traditional peacekeeping
contributing countries helping to bring the force to full capacity. The
commander of the hybrid force would be an African commander jointly appointed by
AU and U.N. officials.
Shortly after the talks, however, Sudanese
Foreign Minister Lam Akol denied that Sudan agreed to a command and control
structure by the UN. Akol said that further discussion must take place within
the Sudanese government before a final agreement is reached. The proposal put
forth by Secretary General Kofi Annan was only agreed to "in principle" by the
Sudanese government. On Sudanese state television, Sudanese President Omar al-Bashir
stated that Sudan would welcome financial, material, logistic, or technical
support from the UN, but did not comment on a command and control structure.
Further disagreement seemed evident regarding the number of troops on the
ground. The UN had originally stated that the Sudanese government agreed to as
many as 17,000 troops, while Khartoum stated that 7,000 would be sufficient.
While Citizens for Global Solutions applauds the international community for taking this step forward in
protecting the people of Darfur, various concerns remain regarding the
effectiveness of a hybrid force. An expanded peacekeeping force in Darfur must
have a stronger mandate than the current AMIS force. There is a possibility that
Sudanese President al-Bashir feels pressured into agreeing to a larger force but
wants to limit its scope and mandate in order to divert attention from his
actions in Sudan. Sudanese officials fear the possibility of a U.N. force in
Darfur and increased accessibility for the ICC investigation into atrocities in
the region.
+ DARFUR RESOURCE CENTER
Updated November 20, 2006
+ TAKE ACTION
|